Teaching the professors how to pick good funds
Imagine standing at a podium in a lecture hall and being questioned by 100 professors for two hours. It's the stuff of student nightmares. But that's exactly where I found myself when I recently addressed a bevy of professors from the University of Toronto on financial matters.
During my talk I mentioned a study I did about a decade ago on fund fees and performance. I could recall the details only dimly but remembered that back then Canadian equity funds managed to outperform the market before fees - by about 0.6 percentage points a year, if memory served - but lagged considerably after fees.
My learned audience was quite friendly but, as you might expect from a group of professors, they wanted to know more. So I set out to update the numbers.
My first stop: the fund filter at globefund.com. I pulled up data on Canadian equity funds and focused on non-index open-ended funds with five-year track records. To estimate each fund's performance before fees I simply boosted each fund's five-year average return by its current annual fee (usually referred to as a management expense ratio, or MER). The accompanying graph shows the number of funds achieving various (asset-weighted) return levels on both a before- and after-fee basis.
Obviously fees make a big difference. On average the funds gained 2.95 per cent a year before fees and 0.96 per cent a year after fees over the five-year period ending Oct. 31, 2011. At the same time the S&P/TSX Composite gained an average of 2.71 per cent a year.
Before fees, the fund managers bested the index by a meagre 0.24 percentage points a year. After fees were deducted, the funds trailed the index by 1.75 percentage points a year. In other words, despite being smart cookies, the average manager didn't outperform by a sufficient margin to earn back the fees they charged.
The situation might actually be even grimmer because the data has not been adjusted for survivorship bias, which arises when poorly performing funds are removed from the record after they are closed or merged with other funds.
What's an investor to do? Stick to low-fee funds, of course. Index funds are prime candidates. If you're not ready to become an indexer, opt for lower-fee active funds. As it happens, many of the funds that bested the index were low-fee funds. Consider, for instance, the Mawer Canadian Equity fund, which charges a low 1.22 per cent annual fee (MER) and managed five-year annual average performance of 3.79 per cent.
When I'm next quizzed by a pack of professors, I'll point them to a good low-fee fund.
First published in the Globe and Mail, December 3 2011.
|Disclaimers: Consult with a qualified investment adviser before trading. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, financial advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. More...